The Psychology of Litter: How Human Behavior Shapes the Cleanliness of Cities

Written By Angus Jackson

By Angus Jackson

Littering in cities such as New York is often described as a failure of enforcement or infrastructure, but psychology has a richer story. What people see, think, and feel about their surroundings affects their decision to put litter into a bin or on the ground. Improving this human element is key to having a cleaner, greener city.

One of the most powerful psychological motivators for littering is attitude. Studies have shown that what people think about litter affects behavior. For example, research on cigarette-butt littering among young adults showed that those who thought butts were biodegradable or non-harmful were significantly more likely to discard them on the ground. The same study clarified that individuals who did not object to seeing litter were much more likely to have littered in the recent past compared to people who objected. That is, indifference generates inaction. If residents do not care about how things look around them, then they are less likely to protect them.

That indifference turns contagious when litter is already on display. Data from the national litter survey conducted by Keep America Beautiful revealed that 81 percent of litter is actually intentional and occurs most often in already trash-covered-looking locations. People are twice as likely to litter if someone else has littered before them. This is what psychologists call the "broken windows effect," where visible disarray brings about more of it. A single full trash can can make a block of well-maintained to unsupervised in a matter of hours.

Physical surroundings and layout are also a powerful force. A socioecological examination of littering public parks found that fully half of all disposes were not appropriate, but rates plummeted when waste receptacles were on hand and the space was immaculately maintained. The researchers also found that people littered more when alone, suggesting that the presence of others gives rise to a tacit social cue to behave responsibly. These findings suggest that well-maintained and beautiful, and well-serviced areas generate cleaner behavior in response.

Perceived control is another key part of the equation. A recently released new behavioral survey indicated that while 85 percent of urban respondents said they could quite easily not litter, fewer than half perceived littering as a serious issue. The majority expected that urban cleaning mechanisms would somehow take care of their waste, weakening their sense of personal responsibility. This attitude is particularly valuable in New York, where trash collectors are so widespread that neighbors may unconsciously assume cleanliness is someone else's job.

Even subtle reminders can alter this mentality. Studies with photos of "watching eyes" found that people were less apt to litter when those eyes were nearby, which shows that subtle cues about social norms can actually impact behavior. Similarly, Keep America Beautiful also suggests that younger people are statistically more inclined to litter than older people, further emphasizing the need for civic education early on. Distance to trash cans also has a quantifiable effect; if a trash can is ten feet away, littering is significantly lessened, but when over ten feet away, it increases enormously.

Collectively, these pieces of evidence illustrate that littering is not so much a policy or engineering failure, but a failure of psychology and perception. The cleanest cities are those that foster pride, responsibility, and eyes-on visibility of concern. Change in New York will not come from more receptacles or stricter penalties, but from the way people see themselves contributing to the cleanliness of the streets.

Sources Used:

Angus Jackson
Previous

Tourism, Foot Traffic, and the Hidden Cost of Litter in NYC
Next

Clean Streets, Community Pride: How Local Engagement Moves the Needle on Litter